10 SaaS Founders Wanted: 14 Days of GEO Tracker AI Pro
I'm opening 10 spots for SaaS Hive founders who want to see how their product appears across ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google AI.
For 14 days, I'll give you GEO Tracker AI Pro access at no cost.
The goal is simple: use it with your real SaaS, real competitors and real buyer queries — then tell me what is useful, confusing or missing.
I'm especially interested in whether the product helps you answer questions like:
Does AI mention or recommend my product?
Which competitors appear instead?
Which sources influence those answers?
What should I improve to increase my AI visibility?
I'm keeping this cohort to 10 founders so I can follow the accounts and feedback properly.
If you want one of the spots, reply here or check the feedback request I just posted.
Awshar AI
Win customers by understanding their pains, gains & thoughts
Comments (8)
Thank you for doing this, Petr 👍🏻
Hi, did you see the email from me?
Down for this. still early with banalo.business, so this feels like exactly the right time to figure out if we're even showing up when people ask ai tools about d2c brand tools, perfume formulation, or supplier sourcing.
Genuinely curious what competitors are getting recommended instead of us, that answer alone would be worth a lot right now.
count me in if there's still a spot.
> Absolutely — there’s a spot for Banalo.business.
>
> Which market matters most for you right now: US, Europe, Asia, or another specific market? That will help us set the right buyer queries and competitor context.
>
> Quick note for transparency: English-language research is currently the strongest. We can test other languages too, but Cyrillic and Hindi/Devanagari queries may be less reliable in the current version.
↳ Replying to Petr GEO Tracker AI
India for now, that's our core market. Long term we're thinking global, but want to nail this market first.
Good to know about the language limitation, not a concern for us though, our audience researches in English anyway.
↳ Replying to Sahil Thakur
Great — India first, English queries. That gives us a solid starting point 🙌
One thing I’ve learned during roughly eight months of building GEO Tracker AI: real GEO / AEO / AI-search measurement is part science, part alchemy 🙂
It’s not only about the language of the prompt. The market, country and regional context can change which products, sources, directories and competitors appear in an AI answer. GEO Tracker AI is currently strongest for English-language research in North America and Europe. We’ve added more countries and languages, but India is a market we still want to validate carefully rather than pretend it works perfectly from day one.
We saw this even in the Czech market: price-comparison sites, directories and listings were initially appearing alongside actual competitors. We had to identify and classify them separately, because mixing them together changes everything — visibility score, share of voice, mentions and the actions we recommend.
We’re currently improving our free snapshot methodology based on recent testing and learnings. Once that update is ready — hopefully later today or tomorrow — I’ll run a manual internal check for Banalo.business with India + English buyer queries, and look at the specific market patterns we find.
If you can share a little more about how Indian customers describe the problem — especially the words they use around perfume formulation, supplier sourcing and D2C tools — that would be extremely useful. Then we’ll test it properly together. Thanks for being willing to help us push the limits of GEO Tracker AI 🚀
↳ Replying to Petr GEO Tracker AI
Makes sense, appreciate you being upfront about validating India carefully rather than assuming it works out of the box, that's the right approach honestly.
On the specific language piece, still gathering that data myself. early days, so i don't have a clean list of the exact phrases yet.
What i can share is the problem in plain terms: people search around things like finding perfume oil suppliers, MOQ, packaging vendors, and figuring out actual margins before committing money, but the specific words they use, i want to actually go back and check real user language before giving you something half guessed.
Happy to dig into this properly and share once i have it, rather than give you noisy data now.
↳ Replying to Sahil Thakur
> Perfect — that’s exactly the right approach. I’ll get the first checks running and see what we find. I’ll keep you posted.
>
> As I mentioned, no rush on the language data — real user wording is much more valuable than guesses. Thanks again for your time and willingness to test this with us 🙌
Sign in to comment or upvote.