PaperLocal launches tomorrow — private PDF tools that stay in your browser

I’m launching PaperLocal on SaaS Hive tomorrow. It’s a free, private-by-default PDF toolkit for professionals, students, freelancers, and anyone who would rather not upload sensitive documents to a server.

The hardest part was making the live preview and downloaded result match exactly across page rotation, watermark placement, ordering, and multi-step workflows. Local processing is only useful if users can trust the output.

Launch page: https://saashive.com/products/paperlocal

I’d love support with testing real-world documents—especially scans and unusual layouts.

Question for other founders: when a tool says “private” or “processed locally,” what evidence or UX signal makes you actually trust that claim?