What's one thing about running multiple businesses at once that nobody warns you about?
For me it wasn't the workload, it was the context-switching cost. I spent almost 30 years in organizational development before I ended up running three separate businesses at once, and I expected the hard part to be "doing more work." It wasn't. The hard part was that every time I switched from business A to business B, I lost a few minutes just remembering where things stood, and that tax happened dozens of times a day.
Nobody warns you that the actual bottleneck isn't your time, it's your working memory. You can hire your way out of workload. You can't hire your way out of being the only person who holds the full picture of all three businesses in their head, especially early on before you have people you trust running things day to day.
That frustration is a big part of why I ended up building FounderFlow instead of just buying another project management tool. I needed something that reconstructed "where things stand" for me instead of me having to reconstruct it myself six times a day.
Curious what the surprising bottleneck was for other multi-business or multi-product founders here. Was it time, money, attention, trust, something else?
Awshar AI
Win customers by understanding their pains, gains & thoughts
Comments (6)
In my case, I think I am the bottle neck 🤦🏻♂️. Still having a hard time delegating things to other people.
Sergey, that's honestly the hardest one to fix because it's not really a tools problem, it's a trust problem. I went through the same thing. What helped me wasn't a better task list, it was building something that could tell me which things actually needed my eyes that day, so I stopped feeling like I had to check everything myself just in case. Doesn't remove the need to delegate, but it took the guesswork out of what to delegate first.
Yes, finally someone else is talking about this! I know this problem too well. It's impossible to remember all the details about every business if you're running several of them. For me the relief came when I started training AI agents for each business, and also creating an AI co-founder that sits above all of them. But I still struggle to use it consistently because the habit of running everything myself is deeply ingrained. Can't wait to learn more about your solution, Stacy!
Olga, training separate agents per business and then one that sits above all of them is basically the architecture I ended up needing too, just applied to my own three businesses instead of built as products. The habit of running everything yourself, which you named, is the same thing I had to unlearn, and confidence grading was my workaround so I could let go without feeling blind. Right now FounderFlow is not live publicly yet. We are onboarding the first 30 founding members personally so I can work through exactly this trust question with each person directly. Would that kind of early, hands-on setup be useful for what you are running, or are you already past that stage with your own agents?
↳ Replying to Stacy Wycoff
I appreciate the invite, Stacy! I'm definitely interested in seeing how FounderFlow works. My hesitation is whether it's the right fit for my setup. I run subscription-based online products, so my inbox isn't full of deals and client follow-ups the way a service business or agency would be. Most of my work lives in community conversations and product development. Would FounderFlow still add value for that kind of workflow, or is it better suited for founders with heavier deal flow and client communication?
↳ Replying to Olga Kargopolova
Olga, I want to give you a straight answer instead of stretching the pitch to fit your situation. The parts of FounderFlow built around deal flow and client follow-ups will not do much for you if your day already lives in community conversations and product decisions instead of a sales pipeline. Where I think it could still help is the working memory problem itself, holding Unhid, Fabify, and SaaS Hive in one place and telling you which of the three actually needs you today, independent of whether the signal is a deal or a product decision. That is a narrower promise than the full pitch, and I would rather be specific about it than vague. Does the working memory piece alone sound worth testing, or does the rest of the product need to fit too before a founding spot makes sense for you?
Sign in to comment or upvote.